"Marc Champagne" <marcch.AT.videotron.DOT.ca> wrote in message
news:Xns### [at] 204213191226...
>
> Would it not be wise for the scale statement to assume 1 instead of 0 for
> those vectors that are not specified.
>

A common request. I *think* the problem is that If the default for an
unspecified vector was changed to 1, this would have an impact on translate and
rotate vectors (where defaulting to 0 is desired).

In the end, you are only getting a warning, which you may ignore.

Post a reply to this message